Measurement Invariance of a Refined Values Scale

نویسندگان

  • Jan Cieciuch
  • Eldad Davidov
  • Michele Vecchione
  • Constanze Beierlein
  • Shalom H. Schwartz
چکیده

Several studies that measured basic human values across countries with the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21) reported violations of measurement invariance. Such violations may hinder meaningful cross-cultural research on human values because value scores may not be comparable. Schwartz et al. (2012) proposed a refined value theory and a new instrument (PVQ-5X) to measure 19 more narrowly defined values. We tested the measurement invariance of this instrument across eight countries. Configural and metric invariance were established for all values across almost all countries. Scalar invariance was supported across nearly all countries for 10 values. The analyses revealed that the cross-country invariance properties of the values measured with the PVQ-5X are substantially better than those measured with the PVQ-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114527348 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-94906 Accepted Version Originally published at: Cieciuch, Jan; Davidov, Eldad; Vecchione, Michele; Beierlein, Constanze; Schwartz, Shalom H (2014). The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values: A Test Across Eight Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5):764-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114527348 MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE Jan Cieciuch Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Switzerland and University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland Eldad Davidov Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Switzerland Michele Vecchione “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy Constanze Beierlein Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, GESIS, Mannheim, Germany Shalom H. Schwartz The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and National Research University-Higher School of Economics, Moscow This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology following peer review. It was first published online in this journal on March 19, 2014. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: http://jcc.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/03/14/0022022114527348 or under doi: 10.1177/0022022114527348 MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 1 Running Head: MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values. A Test across Eight Countries Jan Cieciuch [email protected] Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Switzerland and University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland Contact address: Andreasstrasse 15, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland Tel: +41 44 635 23 22, Fax: +41 44 635 23 99 Eldad Davidov Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Switzerland Michele Vecchione “Sapienza” University of Rome, Italy Constanze Beierlein Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, GESIS, Mannheim, Germany Shalom H. Schwartz The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and National Research University-Higher School of Economics, Moscow MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 2 Author Note The work of the first and second authors on this paper was supported by the Scientific Exchange Program (Switzerland) and the Research Priority Program ‘Social Networks’, University of Zurich. The work of the first author was partially supported by Grant DEC2011/01/D/HS6/04077 from the Polish National Science Centre. The work of the fifth author on this paper was partly supported by the Higher School of Economics (HSE) Basic Research Program (International Laboratory of Socio-Cultural Research). The second author would like to thank the EUROLAB, GESIS, Cologne, for their hospitality during work on this paper. The authors would like to thank Lisa Trierweiler for the English proof of the manuscript. MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 3 Abstract Several studies that measured basic human values across countries with the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21) reported violations of measurement invariance. Such violations may hinder meaningful cross-cultural research on human values because value scores may not be comparable. Schwartz et al. (2012) proposed a refined value theory and a new instrument (PVQ-5X) to measure 19 more narrowly defined values. We tested the measurement invariance of this instrument across eight countries. Configural and metric invariance were established for all values across almost all countries. Scalar invariance was supported across nearly all countries for 10 values. The analyses revealed that the cross-country invariance properties of the values measured with the PVQ-5X are substantially better than those measured with the PVQ-21.Several studies that measured basic human values across countries with the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21) reported violations of measurement invariance. Such violations may hinder meaningful cross-cultural research on human values because value scores may not be comparable. Schwartz et al. (2012) proposed a refined value theory and a new instrument (PVQ-5X) to measure 19 more narrowly defined values. We tested the measurement invariance of this instrument across eight countries. Configural and metric invariance were established for all values across almost all countries. Scalar invariance was supported across nearly all countries for 10 values. The analyses revealed that the cross-country invariance properties of the values measured with the PVQ-5X are substantially better than those measured with the PVQ-21.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing results of an exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: a cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values

One of the most frequently used procedures for measurement invariance testing is the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). Muthén and Asparouhov recently proposed a new approach to test for approximate rather than exact measurement invariance using Bayesian MGCFA. Approximate measurement invariance permits small differences between parameters otherwise constrained to be equal in the ...

متن کامل

An Extension of Enhanced Russell Measure to deal with Interval Scale Data in DEA

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models with interval inputs and outputs have been rarely discussed in DEA literature. This paper, using the enhanced Russell measurement proposes an extended model which permits the presence of interval scale variables which can take both negative and positive values. The model is compared with most well-known DEA models of which include the CCR model, the BCC mo...

متن کامل

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS) in students

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS) including reliability, validity, measurement invariance among demographic variables and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Method: In this cross-sectional study, 390 college students from the three universities in Tehran were a...

متن کامل

How to Read Probability Distributions as Statements about Process

Probability distributions can be read as simple expressions of information. Each continuous probability distribution describes how information changes with magnitude. Once one learns to read a probability distribution as a measurement scale of information, opportunities arise to understand the processes that generate the commonly observed patterns. Probability expressions may be parsed into fou...

متن کامل

Alternate Cutoff Values and DFIT Tests of Measurement Invariance

Likert scales are routinely used in educational and psychological research as measures of constructs of interest. If sound scale development procedures are followed, the resulting scale can reliably and validly measure a construct. However, if a given scale is used to make comparisons among different populations of respondents (e.g., cultures; Riordan & Vandenberg, 1994), over time in longitudi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017